Bonus–malus systems with different claim types and varying deductibles        
        
    
        Volume 4, Issue 2 (2017), pp. 141–159
            
    
                    Pub. online: 28 June 2017
                    
        Type: Research Article
            
                
             Open Access
Open Access
        
            
    
                Received
10 April 2017
                                    10 April 2017
                Revised
11 June 2017
                                    11 June 2017
                Accepted
13 June 2017
                                    13 June 2017
                Published
28 June 2017
                    28 June 2017
Abstract
The paper deals with bonus–malus systems with different claim types and varying deductibles. The premium relativities are softened for the policyholders who are in the malus zone and these policyholders are subject to per claim deductibles depending on their levels in the bonus–malus scale and the types of the reported claims. We introduce such bonus–malus systems and study their basic properties. In particular, we investigate when it is possible to introduce varying deductibles, what restrictions we have and how we can do this. Moreover, we deal with the special case where varying deductibles are applied to the claims reported by policyholders occupying the highest level in the bonus–malus scale and consider two allocation principles for the deductibles. Finally, numerical illustrations are presented.
            References
 Bonsdorff, H.: On asymptotic properties of bonus–malus systems based on the number and on the size of the claims. Scand. Actuar. J. 2005, 309–320 (2005). MR2164049. doi:10.1080/03461230510009826
 Denuit, M., Maréchal, X., Pitrebois, S., Walhin, J.-F.: Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts: Risk Classification, Credibility and Bonus–Malus Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007). MR2384837. doi:10.1002/9780470517420
 Frangos, N.E., Vrontos, S.D.: Design of optimal bonus–malus systems with a frequency and a severity component on an individual basis in automobile insurance. ASTIN Bull. 31, 1–22 (2001). MR1945629. doi:10.2143/AST.31.1.991
 Gómez-Déniz, E.: Bivariate credibility bonus–malus premiums distinguishing between two types of claims. Insur. Math. Econ. 70, 117–124 (2016). MR3543037. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.009
 Gómez-Déniz, E., Hernández-Bastida, A., Fernández-Sánchez, M.P.: Computing credibility bonus–malus premiums using the total claim amount distribution. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 43, 1047–1061 (2014). MR3331161
 Mahmoudvand, R., Hassani, H.: Generalized bonus–malus systems with a frequency and a severity component on an individual basis in automobile insurance. ASTIN Bull. 39, 307–315 (2009). MR2749888. doi:10.2143/AST.39.1.2038066
 Mert, M., Saykan, Y.: On a bonus–malus system where the claim frequency distribution is geometric and the claim severity distribution is Pareto. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 34, 75–81 (2005). MR2212712
 Norberg, R.: A credibility theory for automobile bonus system. Scand. Actuar. J. 1976, 92–107 (1976). MR0428666. doi:10.1080/03461238.1976.10405605
 Pitrebois, S., Denuit, M., Walhin, J.-F.: Bonus–malus systems with varying deductibles. ASTIN Bull. 35, 261–274 (2005). MR2143217. doi:10.2143/AST.35.1.583175
 Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V., Teugels, J.: Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1999). MR1680267. doi:10.1002/9780470317044
 Tzougas, G., Vrontos, S., Frangos, N.: Optimal bonus–malus systems using finite mixture models. ASTIN Bull. 44, 417–444 (2014). MR3389581. doi:10.1017/asb.2013.31
 
            