Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications logo


  • Help
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. To appear
  3. Asymptotic properties of the heat equati ...

Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • Related articles
  • More
    Article info Full article Related articles

Asymptotic properties of the heat equation driven by stochastic measure
Vadym Radchenko ORCID icon link to view author Vadym Radchenko details  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.15559/26-VMSTA310
Pub. online: 30 October 2026      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Received
24 July 2026
Accepted
12 October 2026
Published
30 October 2026

Abstract

For the heat equations driven by a stochastic measure on $[-𝐿,𝐿]$ with the Dirichlet boundary condition, we prove that solutions tend to the solution of the heat equations defined on R as $𝐿\to \mathrm{\infty }$. The estimate of the convergence rate is obtained. For a stochastic measure, we assume the 𝜎-additivity in probability only.

1 Introduction

In this paper, we consider the stochastic heat equation with the Dirichlet boundary condition, which can formally be written as
(1.1)
\[\begin{array}{c}\displaystyle \frac{πœ•{𝑒^{𝐿}}}{πœ•π‘‘}\displaystyle =\frac{{πœ•^{2}}{𝑒^{𝐿}}}{πœ•{π‘₯^{2}}}\displaystyle +𝑓\displaystyle \Bigl(𝑑\displaystyle ,π‘₯\displaystyle ,{𝑒^{𝐿}}\displaystyle (𝑑\displaystyle ,π‘₯\displaystyle )\displaystyle \Bigr)\displaystyle +𝜎\displaystyle (𝑑\displaystyle ,π‘₯\displaystyle )\frac{πœ•πœ‡}{πœ•π‘₯}\displaystyle ,\\ {} \displaystyle {𝑒^{𝐿}}\displaystyle (𝑑\displaystyle ,\displaystyle -𝐿\displaystyle )\displaystyle ={𝑒^{𝐿}}\displaystyle (𝑑\displaystyle ,𝐿\displaystyle )\displaystyle =0\displaystyle ,\hspace{10.0pt}{𝑒^{𝐿}}\displaystyle (0\displaystyle ,π‘₯\displaystyle )\displaystyle ={𝑒_{0}}\displaystyle (π‘₯\displaystyle )\displaystyle ,\end{array}\]
where $(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times [-𝐿,𝐿]$, and πœ‡ is a stochastic measure defined on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{R})$ (Borel 𝜎-algebra in R). For πœ‡ we assume only 𝜎-additivity in probability, assumptions for $𝑓,\hspace{2.5pt}𝜎$ and ${𝑒_{0}}$ are given in Section 3. We study the solution to the formal equation (1.1) in the mild form (see (3.1) below).
We study the convergence as $𝐿\to \mathrm{\infty }$, and prove that ${𝑒^{𝐿}}$ tends to the solution to the equation
(1.2)
\[\frac{πœ•π‘’}{πœ•π‘‘}=\frac{{πœ•^{2}}𝑒}{πœ•{π‘₯^{2}}}+𝑓\Bigl(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr)+𝜎(𝑑,π‘₯)\frac{πœ•πœ‡}{πœ•π‘₯},\hspace{10.0pt}𝑒(0,π‘₯)={𝑒_{0}}(π‘₯),\]
where $(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times \mathrm{R}$. The solution to equation (1.2) is also considered in the mild form (see (3.2) below).
As the main result of the paper, we obtain an exponential rate for the pointwise convergence ${𝑒^{𝐿}}\to 𝑒$. This is a natural result that follows from the form of the Green’s functions. Zero Dirichlet conditions represent absorbing boundaries whose effect decays exponentially as the domain expands.
For an equation driven by space-time white noise, this problem was studied in [2, 3], where the Neumann and mixed boundary conditions were also considered.
The difference of the form $|{𝑒^{𝐿}}-𝑒|$ is often called a localization error and, in different settings, has been studied in [1, 6]. The impact of localization on some computational problems in financial mathematics is considered in [8].
Theory of equations driven by stochastic measures is developed in [15]. Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to (1.1) and (1.2), their boundedness and HΓΆlder regularity, are proved in [18] and [17] respectively. Also, generalization of equation (1.2) is considered in [16], where the ${\mathrm{L}_{2}}$-continuity of the solution was proved. For the heat equation on a bounded domain in ${\mathrm{R}^{𝑑}}$, we can refer to [10].
Different classes of equations driven by space-time white noise are considered in detail in [4], those driven by spatially colored Gaussian noise in [5], and those driven by a LΓ©vy process in [12].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains the basic information concerning the integrals with respect to stochastic measures. In Section 3, we formulate the problem and our main assumptions. In Section 4 we obtain an estimate for the difference of the stochastic integrals from our equations. Section 5 contains the main result of the paper.

2 Preliminaries

Let ${\mathrm{L}_{0}}={\mathrm{L}_{0}}(\Omega ,\mathcal{F},\mathrm{P})$ be the set of all real-valued random variables defined on the complete probability space $(\Omega ,\mathcal{F},\mathrm{P})$. Convergence in ${\mathrm{L}_{0}}$ means the convergence in probability. Let X be an arbitrary set and $\mathcal{B}$ a 𝜎-algebra of subsets of X.
DefinitionΒ 1.
A 𝜎-additive mapping $πœ‡:\hspace{2.5pt}\mathcal{B}\to {\mathrm{L}_{0}}$ is called stochastic measure (SM).
We do not assume the moment existence or martingale properties for SM. We can say that πœ‡ is an ${\mathrm{L}_{0}}$-valued measure.
Important examples of SMs are random orthogonal measure with finite structural function (see [7, Section 5.3]), 𝛼-stable random measures defined on a 𝜎-algebra for $𝛼\in (0,1)\cup (1,2]$ (see [19, Chapter 3]). Many examples of the SMs on $\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{R})$ may be given by the Wiener-type integral
(2.1)
\[πœ‡(𝐴)={\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{\mathbf{1}_{𝐴}}(π‘₯)𝑓(π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑{π‘Œ_{π‘₯}},\]
where 𝑓 is a deterministic function, integrable on R. For instance, we can take in (2.1) any square integrable martingale ${π‘Œ_{π‘₯}}$, or ${π‘Œ_{π‘₯}}={π‘Š_{π‘₯}^{𝐻}}$ – the fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index $𝐻\gt 1/2$ (see Corollary 1.9.4 in [11]).
Other examples of SMs can be found in Section 1.2.1 [15].
For deterministic measurable functions $𝑓:\mathrm{X}\to \mathrm{R}$, an integral of the form ${\int _{\mathrm{X}}}𝑓\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡$ is defined and studied in [9, Chapter 7], [15, Chapter 1]. In particular, every bounded measurable 𝑓 is integrable with respect to any πœ‡.
Below, we will use the following statement.
Lemma 1 (Lemma 3.1 [14], Lemma 2.3 [15]).
Let πœ‡ be an SM on $(\mathrm{X},\mathcal{B})$, ${𝑓_{π‘˜}}:\hspace{2.5pt}\mathrm{X}\to \mathrm{R},\hspace{2.5pt}π‘˜\ge 1$, be measurable functions such that $\hat{𝑓}(π‘₯)={\sum _{π‘˜=1}^{\infty }}|{𝑓_{π‘˜}}(π‘₯)|$ is integrable with respect to πœ‡. Then
\[{\sum \limits_{π‘˜=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}{\Biggl({\int _{\mathrm{X}}}{𝑓_{π‘˜}}\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡\Biggr)^{2}}\lt \mathrm{\infty }\hspace{10.0pt}\textit{a.s.}\]
For any $𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}$ and all $𝑛\ge 0$, put
\[{𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}=𝑗+π‘˜{2^{-𝑛}},\hspace{10.0pt}0\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}},\hspace{10.0pt}{\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}=\Bigl({𝑑_{(π‘˜-1)𝑛}^{(𝑗)}},{𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr],\hspace{10.0pt}1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}.\]
The following lemma is a key tool for estimating a version of the stochastic integral. In the sequel, we assume that SM πœ‡ is defined on Borel subsets of R.
Lemma 2 (Lemma 2.8 [15]).
Let 𝑍 be an arbitrary set, and the function $π‘ž(𝑧,π‘₯):𝑍\times [𝑗,𝑗+1]\to \mathrm{R}$ be such that all paths $π‘ž(𝑧,\cdot )$ are continuous on $[𝑗,𝑗+1]$, $\mathrm{A}\subset (𝑗,𝑗+1]$ be a Borel set. Denote
\[{π‘ž_{𝑛}}(𝑧,π‘₯)=\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}π‘ž\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{(π‘˜-1)𝑛}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr){\mathbf{1}_{{\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}}}(π‘₯).\]
Then the random function
\[πœ‚(𝑧)={\int _{\mathrm{A}}}π‘ž(𝑧,π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(π‘₯),\hspace{10.0pt}𝑧\in 𝑍,\]
has a version
(2.2)
\[\tilde{πœ‚}(𝑧)={\int _{A}}{π‘ž_{0}}(𝑧,π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(π‘₯)+\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}\Biggl({\int _{A}}{π‘ž_{𝑛}}(𝑧,π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(π‘₯)-{\int _{A}}{π‘ž_{𝑛-1}}(𝑧,π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(π‘₯)\Biggr)\]
such that for all $𝛽\gt 0$, $πœ”\in \Omega $, $𝑧\in 𝑍$
(2.3)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle \Bigl|\tilde{πœ‚}(𝑧)\Bigr|& \displaystyle \le \Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑗)πœ‡(\mathrm{A})\Bigr|& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|π‘ž\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)-π‘ž\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{(π‘˜-1)𝑛}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\times {\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{-𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\cap \mathrm{A}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}.& \end{array}\]
In the sequel, by 𝐢 and $𝐢(πœ”)$ we denote the constants and random constants, respectively, whose exact values are not important. Notations of the kind ${𝐢_{πœ†}}$, ${𝐢_{𝛿}}$ means that these constants may depend of πœ†, 𝛿 respectively.

3 The problem

We consider (1.1) in the mild form
(3.1)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle {𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle ={\int _{(-𝐿,𝐿]}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦){𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{(-𝐿,𝐿]}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{(-𝐿,𝐿]}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦),& \end{array}\]
where equality holds a.s. for each $(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times [-𝐿,𝐿]$. Here ${𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦)$ is the fundamental solution of the heat equation with the Dirichlet boundary condition
\[\frac{πœ•π‘’}{πœ•π‘‘}=\displaystyle \frac{{πœ•^{2}}𝑒}{πœ•{π‘₯^{2}}},\hspace{10.0pt}(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times [-𝐿,𝐿],\hspace{10.0pt}𝑒(𝑑,-𝐿)=𝑒(𝑑,𝐿)=0.\]
It is known that
\[{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦)={\sum \limits_{𝑛=-\mathrm{\infty }}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}\Bigl(𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦+4𝑛𝐿)-𝑝\Bigl(𝑑,π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿\Bigr)\Bigr),\]
where
\[𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯)=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{4πœ‹π‘‘}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{π‘₯^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}\]
is a standard heat kernel (see, for example, [13, Section 8.4.2], [4, Lemma 1.4.1]).
We will refer to the following assumptions on elements of (3.1).
AssumptionΒ A1.
${𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)={𝑒_{0}}(𝑦,πœ”):\mathrm{R}\times \Omega \to \mathrm{R}$ is measurable and $|{𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)|\le {𝐢_{{𝑒_{0}}}}(πœ”)$ for some random constant ${𝐢_{{𝑒_{0}}}}(πœ”)$.
AssumptionΒ A2.
$𝑓(𝑠,𝑦,𝑣):[0,𝑇]\times \mathrm{R}\times \mathrm{R}\to \mathrm{R}$ is measurable, and bounded:
\[\Bigl|𝑓(𝑠,𝑦,𝑣)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{𝑓}}\]
for some constant ${𝐢_{𝑓}}$.
AssumptionΒ A3.
$𝑓(𝑠,𝑦,𝑣)$ is globally Lipschitz in $𝑣,𝑦$:
\[\Bigl|𝑓(𝑠,{𝑦_{1}},{𝑣_{1}})-𝑓(𝑠,{𝑦_{2}},{𝑣_{2}})\Bigr|\le {𝐿_{𝑓}}\Bigl(|{𝑣_{1}}-{𝑣_{2}}|+|{𝑦_{1}}-{𝑦_{2}}|\Bigr),\hspace{10.0pt}{𝑦_{𝑖}},\hspace{2.5pt}{𝑣_{𝑖}}\in \mathrm{R},\]
for some constant ${𝐿_{𝑓}}$.
AssumptionΒ A4.
$𝜎(𝑠,𝑦):[0,𝑇]\times \mathrm{R}\to \mathrm{R}$ is measurable, and
\[\Bigl|𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{𝜎}},\hspace{10.0pt}\Bigl|𝜎(𝑠,{𝑦_{1}})-𝜎(𝑠,{𝑦_{2}})\Bigr|\le {𝐿_{𝜎}}{|{𝑦_{1}}-{𝑦_{2}}|^{𝛽(𝜎)}}\]
for some $1/2\lt 𝛽(𝜎)\lt 1$ and constants ${𝐢_{𝜎}},\hspace{2.5pt}{𝐿_{𝜎}}$.
AssumptionΒ A5.
${|𝑦|^{𝜏}}$ is integrable w.r.t. πœ‡ on R for some $𝜏\gt 1/2$.
Assumptions A1–A4 and Theorem 5.1 1) [18] imply that (3.1) has a unique bounded solution.
Also, we consider (1.2) in the mild form
(3.2)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle 𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle ={\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦){𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦+{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,𝑒(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦).\end{array}\]
The existence and uniqueness of the bounded solution to (3.2) follows from Theorem 5.1 1) [17].
This paper aims to prove that
\[{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)\to 𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯),\hspace{10.0pt}𝐿\to \mathrm{\infty },\]
for each $(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times \mathrm{R}$. Mainly, we will consider $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$ for some fixed $𝛿\gt 0$, $𝑖\ge 1$, and obtain the estimate of $|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)|$ for some versions of the solutions.
In the estimates below, we will use that
(3.3)
\[\Biggl|\frac{πœ•π‘}{πœ•π‘¦}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Biggr|\le \frac{{𝐢_{πœ†}}}{𝑑-𝑠}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(π‘₯-𝑦)^{2}}}{𝑑-𝑠}}}\]
for any $πœ†\in (0,1/4)$ and some constant ${𝐢_{πœ†}}$.

4 Auxiliary lemma

In the sequel, we will use the notations ${𝐷_{𝐿}}=(-𝐿,𝐿]$, ${𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}=\mathrm{R}\backslash (-𝐿,𝐿]$, ${\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}=\mathrm{Z}\backslash \{0\}$.
Consider the stochastic terms
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle {πœ—^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle ={\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦),& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} \displaystyle πœ—(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle ={\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦).& \end{array}\]
In the following statement, we fix any $𝛿\gt 0$, and consider $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$, $𝑖\in {\mathrm{Z}_{+}}$.
LemmaΒ 3.
Let Assumptions A4 and A5 hold. Then, for each $𝛿\gt 0$ there exist versions of ${πœ—^{𝐿}},πœ—$ such that for all $πœ”\in \Omega $ for each $π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$, $𝑖\in {\mathrm{Z}_{+}}$, $0\lt 𝑑\le 𝑇$, for any $0\lt πœ†\lt \frac{1}{4}$ holds
(4.1)
\[\Bigl|{πœ—^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-πœ—(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]
Proof.
For $π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, we will estimate
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle {πœ—^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-πœ—(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle ={\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}-{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)& \\ {} & \displaystyle ={\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Bigl({𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}-{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦):={𝐼_{1}}-{𝐼_{2}}.& \end{array}\]
First, consider ${𝐼_{1}}$. For $π‘₯,𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$,
(4.2)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}& \displaystyle {𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=\sum \limits_{𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦+4𝑛𝐿)& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{20.0pt}-\sum \limits_{𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}}𝑝\Bigl(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿\Bigr)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+2𝐿).& \end{array}\]
For $π‘₯,𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$ we have that $|π‘₯+𝑦+2𝐿|\ge 𝐿-|π‘₯|$.
We will take 𝑖 large enough such that $|π‘₯-𝑦+4𝑛𝐿|,|π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿|\gt 𝑇\ge 𝑑-𝑠,\hspace{2.5pt}𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}$ here. (By Lemma 4.2 [17], πœ— is bounded. By (4.9) of [18], each ${πœ—^{𝑖𝛿}}$ is bounded. Thus, excluding the finite number of 𝑖 does not influence (4.1).)
For fixed $𝑑,π‘₯$ set
(4.3)
\[π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)={\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠,\hspace{10.0pt}𝑧=(𝑑,π‘₯),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}.\]
Our considerations will imply that this function is continuous in 𝑦; thus, the conditions of Lemma 2 hold (for this purpose, we can use estimate (4.6) below).
Consider
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦+β„Ž)-π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)& \displaystyle ={\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl(𝜎(𝑠,𝑦+β„Ž)-𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Bigl(𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦-β„Ž)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦+β„Ž)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle :={𝐼_{11}}+{𝐼_{12}}.\end{array}\]
We will use the following simple estimate for $𝑏/𝑑\ge 1$.
(4.4)
\[{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\frac{1}{π‘Ÿ}{𝑒^{-\frac{𝑏}{π‘Ÿ}}}π‘‘π‘Ÿ\stackrel{𝑏/π‘Ÿ=𝑧}{=}{\int _{𝑏/𝑑}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}\frac{1}{𝑧}{𝑒^{-𝑧}}𝑑𝑧\le {\int _{𝑏/𝑑}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}{𝑒^{-𝑧}}𝑑𝑧={𝑒^{-𝑏/𝑑}}.\]
We get for $|π‘₯-𝑦|,|π‘₯-𝑦-β„Ž|\ge π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|\gt 𝑇$, $β„Ž\lt 𝐿$
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle |{𝐼_{12}}|& \displaystyle \stackrel{\text{A4}}{\le }{𝐢_{𝜎}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Bigl|𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-β„Ž-𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr|𝑑𝑠& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \le {𝐢_{𝜎}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Biggl|{\int _{π‘₯-β„Ž}^{π‘₯}}\displaystyle \frac{πœ•π‘(𝑑-𝑠,𝑣-𝑦)}{πœ•π‘£}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑣\Biggr|𝑑𝑠\stackrel{\text{(3.3)}}{\le }{𝐢_{𝜎}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Biggl(\frac{{𝐢_{πœ†}}}{𝑑-𝑠}\hspace{-1.67pt}{\int _{π‘₯-β„Ž}^{π‘₯}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{|𝑣-𝑦|^{2}}}{𝑑-𝑠}}}𝑑𝑣\Biggr)𝑑𝑠& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{-6.68pt}\stackrel{𝑑-𝑠=π‘Ÿ}{=}{𝐢_{𝜎}}{𝐢_{πœ†}}{\int _{π‘₯-β„Ž}^{π‘₯}}𝑑𝑣{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\frac{1}{π‘Ÿ}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{|𝑣-𝑦|^{2}}}{π‘Ÿ}}}π‘‘π‘Ÿ\stackrel{\text{(4.4)}}{\le }{𝐢_{𝜎}}{𝐢_{πœ†}}{\int _{π‘₯-β„Ž}^{π‘₯}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{|𝑣-𝑦|^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑣& \\ {} & \displaystyle \le {𝐢_{𝜎}}{𝐢_{πœ†}}|β„Ž|{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.& \end{array}\]
Also,
(4.5)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle |{𝐼_{11}}|& \displaystyle \le {\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|𝜎(𝑠,𝑦+β„Ž)-𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \stackrel{\text{A4}}{\le }𝐢{𝐿_{𝜎}}{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{𝑑-𝑠}}{𝑒^{-\frac{{|π‘₯-𝑦|^{2}}}{4(𝑑-𝑠)}}}𝑑𝑠\le 𝐢{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{𝑑-𝑠}}{𝑒^{-\frac{{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4(𝑑-𝑠)}}}𝑑𝑠& \\ {} & \displaystyle \le 𝐢{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{𝑒^{-\frac{{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{𝑑-𝑠}}𝑑𝑠\le 𝐢{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{𝑒^{-\frac{{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}}}.& \end{array}\]
(The constants ${𝐢_{πœ†}}$ and 𝐢 may also depend on 𝜎, though this plays no role in our considerations.) Thus, for any $0\lt πœ†\lt \frac{1}{4}$
(4.6)
\[\Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦+β„Ž)-π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{πœ†}}{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]
Similarly, consider $𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿)$, $𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}$, $𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+2𝐿)$, and for
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle \tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦)& \displaystyle ={\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦+4𝑛𝐿)-\sum \limits_{𝑛\in {\mathrm{Z}^{\ast }}}𝑝\Bigl(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿\Bigr)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯+𝑦+2𝐿)\Biggr)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\end{array}\]
we get
(4.7)
\[\Bigl|\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦+β„Ž)-\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|\le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\hspace{10.0pt}𝑧=(𝑑,π‘₯),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑦,\hspace{2.5pt}𝑦+β„Ž\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}.\]
As in (4.5), we obtain
\[\Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|\le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]
Therefore,
(4.8)
\[\Bigl|\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|\le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\hspace{10.0pt}𝑧=(𝑑,π‘₯),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}.\]
We take $𝜏\gt 1/2$ from A5 and some $𝛽\gt 0$ such that $𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎)\lt 0$. From (2.3), for the version (2.2) of the stochastic integral (taking intervals $[𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]$ instead of $[𝑗,𝑗+1]$ and ${𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}=(𝑗+π‘˜{2^{-𝑛}})𝛿$), we get
(4.9)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle |{𝐼_{1}}|& \displaystyle =\Biggl|{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\Bigl({𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\Biggr|\\ {} & \displaystyle =\Biggl|{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‚(𝑦)\Biggr|\le \sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}\Biggl|{\int _{(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\cap {𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\Biggr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{-13.36pt}\stackrel{\text{(2.3)},𝐿=𝑖𝛿}{\le }\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}}}\Bigl|\tilde{π‘ž}(𝑧,𝑗𝛿)πœ‡\Bigl(\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|\tilde{π‘ž}\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)-\tilde{π‘ž}\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{(π‘˜-1)𝑛}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\times {\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{-𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{-11.69pt}\stackrel{\text{(4.8)},\text{(4.7)}}{\le }𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\Biggl[\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}}}\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}}}{\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛(𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎))}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\Biggr]\\ {} & \displaystyle \le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\Biggl[\hspace{-1.67pt}{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1\Bigr)^{2𝜏}}\Bigl(πœ‡{\Bigl(\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr)^{2}}\Biggr)^{1/2}}{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|+1\Bigr)^{-2𝜏}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{7.5pt}+{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1\Bigr)^{2𝜏}}\hspace{-1.67pt}\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛(𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎))}}\hspace{-3.34pt}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\hspace{-1.67pt}{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|+1\Bigr)^{-2𝜏}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\Biggr].\end{array}\]
Here, the sums with πœ‡ have a form ${\sum _{𝑙=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}{({\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{𝑓_{𝑙}}\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡)^{2}}$, where
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle \Bigl\{{𝑓_{𝑙}}(𝑦),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑙\ge 1\Bigr\}& \displaystyle =\Bigl\{{\Bigl(|𝑗|+1\Bigr)^{𝜏}}\hspace{1.67pt}{\mathbf{1}_{(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]}}(𝑦),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}\Bigr\},\\ {} \displaystyle \Bigl\{{𝑓_{𝑙}}(𝑦),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑙\ge 1\Bigr\}& \displaystyle =\Bigl\{{\Bigl(|𝑗|+1\Bigr)^{𝜏}}{2^{𝑛(𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎))/2}}{\mathbf{1}_{{\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}}}(𝑦),\hspace{2.5pt}𝑗\in \mathrm{Z},\hspace{2.5pt}𝑛\ge 1,\hspace{2.5pt}1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}\Bigr\}.\end{array}\]
We have ${\sum _{𝑙=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}|{𝑓_{𝑙}}(𝑦)|\le 𝐢{(|𝑦|+1)^{𝜏}}$ in both cases. From Lemma 1 it follows that
\[{\sum \limits_{𝑙=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}{\Biggl({\int _{\mathrm{X}}}{𝑓_{𝑙}}\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡\Biggr)^{2}}\lt +\mathrm{\infty }\hspace{2.5pt}\text{a.s.}\]
We take a set ${\Omega _{1}}\subset \Omega $ such that for $πœ”\in {\Omega _{1}}$, this series is finite for both sequences $\{{𝑓_{𝑙}}\}$. Thus $\mathrm{P}({\Omega _{1}})=1$ and
(4.10)
\[|{𝐼_{1}}|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\]
holds for all $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$, $𝑖\in {\mathrm{Z}_{+}}$, and $πœ”\in {\Omega _{1}}$. The set ${\Omega _{1}}$ depends only on πœ‡, 𝛿 and 𝛽.
In ${𝐼_{2}}$ we have $|π‘₯-𝑦|\ge 𝐿-|π‘₯|$. Again we consider $π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)$ from (4.3), now with $|𝑦|\ge 𝐿$. Repeating the consideration from (4.3) to (4.6), we get here
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}\displaystyle \Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦+β„Ž)-π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|& \displaystyle \le {𝐢_{πœ†}}{β„Ž^{𝛽(𝜎)}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} \displaystyle \Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\Bigr|& \displaystyle \le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(π‘˜πΏ-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\hspace{10.0pt}|𝑦|\ge 𝐿.& \end{array}\]
Similarly to (4.9), we get
(4.11)
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle |{𝐼_{2}}|& \displaystyle =\Biggl|{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\Biggr|\\ {} & \displaystyle =\Biggl|{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‚(𝑦)\Biggr|\le \sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}\Biggl|{\int _{(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\cap {𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}π‘ž(𝑧,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\Biggr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{-13.36pt}\stackrel{\text{(2.3)},𝐿=𝑖𝛿}{\le }\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}\Bigl|π‘ž(𝑧,𝑗𝛿)πœ‡\Bigl(\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|π‘ž\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)-π‘ž\Bigl(𝑧,{𝑑_{(π‘˜-1)𝑛}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\times {\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{-𝑛𝛽}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{-16.7pt}\stackrel{\text{(4.8)},\text{(4.7)},𝐿=𝑖𝛿}{\le }𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\Biggl[\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\sum \limits_{𝑗:(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿]\subset {𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}{\Biggl\{\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛(𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎))}}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr\}^{1/2}}\Biggr]\\ {} & \displaystyle \le 𝐢{𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}\Biggl[{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1\Bigr)^{2𝜏}}\Bigl(πœ‡{\Bigl(\Bigl(𝑗𝛿,(𝑗+1)𝛿\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr)^{2}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1\Bigr)^{-2𝜏}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{7.5pt}+{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|\hspace{-1.67pt}+\hspace{-1.67pt}1\Bigr)^{2𝜏}}\hspace{-1.67pt}\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{𝑛(𝛽+1-2𝛽(𝜎))}}\hspace{-1.67pt}\sum \limits_{1\le π‘˜\le {2^{𝑛}}}{\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl({\Delta _{π‘˜π‘›}^{(𝑗)}}\Bigr)\Bigr|^{2}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\hspace{-1.67pt}{\Biggl(\sum \limits_{𝑗\in \mathrm{Z}}{\Bigl(|𝑗|+1\Bigr)^{-2𝜏}}\Biggr)^{\hspace{-1.67pt}1/2}}\Biggr].\end{array}\]
As in (4.10), we get that
(4.12)
\[|{𝐼_{2}}|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\]
(4.10) and (4.12) imply that (4.1) holds. β–‘
RemarkΒ 1.
Let SM πœ‡ be such that $πœ‡((π‘Ž,𝑏])\le 𝐢(πœ”)$, $π‘Ž,\hspace{2.5pt}𝑏\in \mathrm{R}$. Then we can obtain (4.1) for arbitrary $𝐿\in {\mathrm{R}_{+}}$, and get
\[\Bigl|{πœ—^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-πœ—(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le 𝐢(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\]
where $𝐢(πœ”)$ is independent of 𝐿. To prove this, we can fix $𝛿=1$, and note that in this case in (4.9) we get additional summands
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle \Bigl|πœ‡(({𝑗_{0}},𝐿]\cap {𝐷_{𝐿}})\Bigr|+\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl((-𝐿,-{𝑗_{0}}]\Bigr)\Bigr|\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{-𝑛𝛽}}\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl(({𝑑_{{π‘˜_{𝑛}}𝑛}^{({𝑗_{0}})}},𝐿]\Bigr)\Bigr|+\hspace{1.67pt}\sum \limits_{𝑛\ge 1}{2^{-𝑛𝛽}}\Bigl|πœ‡\Bigl(\Bigl(-𝐿,{𝑑_{{π‘˜_{𝑛}}𝑛}^{(-{𝑗_{0}})}}\Bigr]\Bigr)\Bigr|\end{array}\]
for some ${𝑗_{0}}$, ${π‘˜_{𝑛}}$ that depend on 𝐿 (and similar summands in (4.11)). If $πœ‡((π‘Ž,𝑏])\le 𝐢(πœ”)$, then these sums are uniformly bounded.

5 Main result

TheoremΒ 1.
Let Assumptions A1–A5 hold, ${𝑒^{𝐿}}$ is the solution to (3.1), 𝑒 is the solution to (3.2). Then, for each $𝛿\gt 0$ there exist versions of ${𝑒^{𝐿}},𝑒$ such that for all $πœ”\in \Omega $ for each $π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$, $𝑖\in {\mathrm{Z}_{+}}$, $0\lt 𝑑\le 𝑇$, for any $0\lt πœ†\lt \frac{1}{4}$ holds
(5.1)
\[\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]
Proof.
Consider
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle {𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)& \displaystyle =\Biggl({\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦){𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦-{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦){𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\Biggr)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\Biggl({\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}-{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,𝑒(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\Biggr)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+\Biggl({\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}-{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝜎(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\hspace{1.67pt}π‘‘πœ‡(𝑦)\Biggr)\\ {} & \displaystyle :={𝐽_{1}}+{𝐽_{2}}+{𝐽_{3}},\end{array}\]
by Lemma 3, for some versions of the integrals, holds
\[|{𝐽_{3}}|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]
For ${𝐽_{1}}$, we have
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle |{𝐽_{1}}|& \displaystyle \le {\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\Bigl|{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr|\Bigl|{𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦+{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|{𝑒_{0}}(𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\\ {} & \displaystyle \stackrel{\text{A1}}{\le }{𝐢_{{𝑒_{0}}}}(πœ”){\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\Bigl|{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦+{𝐢_{{𝑒_{0}}}}(πœ”){\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\\ {} & \displaystyle :={𝐽_{11}}+{𝐽_{12}}.\end{array}\]
We recall the Chernoff inequality (see, for instance, Example 2.1 [20]). For random variable $𝑋\sim 𝑁(πœ‡,{𝜎^{2}})$ and $π‘Ÿ\ge 0$ holds
(5.2)
\[\mathrm{P}\{𝑋\ge πœ‡+π‘Ÿ\}\le \exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{π‘Ÿ^{2}}}{2{𝜎^{2}}}\Biggr\}.\]
We have that $𝑝(𝑑,𝑦-π‘₯)$, as a function of 𝑦, is the density function of the distribution $𝑁(π‘₯,2𝑑)$.
Thus, for $π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, we obtain
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle {\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑦+4𝑛𝐿)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦& \displaystyle \stackrel{𝑣=𝑦-4𝑛𝐿}{=}{\int _{(-(4𝑛+1)𝐿,-(4𝑛-1)𝐿]}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯-𝑣)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑣\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\stackrel{\text{(5.2)}}{\le }\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{((4|𝑛|-1)𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}.\end{array}\]
In a similar way, we consider $𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯+𝑦+(4𝑛+2)𝐿)$, $𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯+𝑦+2𝐿)$ in (4.2), and obtain that
(5.3)
\[{𝐽_{11}}\le 𝐢(πœ”)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}.\]
Also, (5.2) implies that
(5.4)
\[{𝐽_{12}}\le 2{𝐢_{{𝑒_{0}}}}(πœ”)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}.\]
For ${𝐽_{2}}$, we get
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle |{𝐽_{2}}|& \displaystyle \le {\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\Bigl|{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr|\Bigl|𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)-𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,𝑒(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}+{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|𝑓\Bigl(𝑠,𝑦,{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle :={𝐽_{21}}+{𝐽_{22}}+{𝐽_{23}}.\end{array}\]
Similarly to (5.3), we obtain
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}\displaystyle {𝐽_{21}}& \displaystyle \stackrel{\text{A2}}{\le }{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐢_{𝑓}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}\Bigl|{𝐺^{𝐿}}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯,𝑦)-𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \le 𝐢(πœ”){\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4(𝑑-𝑠)}\Biggr\}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\le 𝐢(πœ”)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}.\end{array}\]
As in (5.4), we get
\[{𝐽_{23}}\stackrel{\text{A2}}{\le }{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{𝐢_{𝑓}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}^{𝑐}}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\le 𝐢(πœ”)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{4𝑑}\Biggr\}.\]
Also
\[{𝐽_{22}}\stackrel{\text{A3}}{\le }{𝐿_{𝑓}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{{𝐷_{𝐿}}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)-𝑒(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr|\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠.\]
Gathering together all estimates of ${𝐽_{1}}$, ${𝐽_{2}}$, and ${𝐽_{3}}$, we obtain that for any $πœ†\lt \frac{1}{4}$
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l@{\hskip10pt}r}& \displaystyle \Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|{\mathbf{1}_{\{π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}\}}}& \displaystyle \hspace{-10.0pt}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}\Biggr\}& \\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{20.0pt}+𝐢(πœ”){\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)-𝑒(𝑠,𝑦)\Bigr|{\mathbf{1}_{\{𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}\}}}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠.& \end{array}\]
For $|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯))-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)|{\mathbf{1}_{|π‘₯|\le 𝐿}}$, we will use the space-time Gronwall-type inequality (see Lemma C.1.7 (d) [4]), and obtain
(5.5)
\[\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le {πœ‰_{𝛿,πœ†,𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)+𝐢(πœ”){\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\mathcal{K}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦){πœ‰_{𝛿,πœ†,𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\]
where $\mathcal{K}$ denotes the series with iterated space-time convolutions
\[\mathcal{K}(𝑑,π‘₯)={\sum \limits_{π‘˜=1}^{\mathrm{\infty }}}{𝑝^{\ast π‘˜}}(𝑑,π‘₯)\]
(see more details in Section C.1.3 [4]) and
\[{πœ‰_{𝛿,πœ†,𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)={𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}\Biggr\}{\mathbf{1}_{\{π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}\}}}.\]
It is well-known that
\[{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝({𝑑_{1}},π‘₯-𝑦)𝑝({𝑑_{2}},𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦=𝑝({𝑑_{1}}+{𝑑_{2}},π‘₯),\]
therefore,
\[{𝑝^{\ast 2}}(𝑑,π‘₯)={\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)𝑝(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠={\int _{0}^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠=𝑑𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯),\]
and applying induction, we easily obtain that
\[{𝑝^{\ast π‘˜}}(𝑑,π‘₯)=\frac{{𝑑^{π‘˜-1}}}{(π‘˜-1)!}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯)\hspace{10.0pt}\Rightarrow \hspace{10.0pt}\mathcal{K}(𝑑,π‘₯)={𝑒^{𝑑}}𝑝(𝑑,π‘₯).\]
Further, we get
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle {\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\mathcal{K}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦){πœ‰_{𝛿,πœ†,𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=𝐢(πœ”){\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}{𝑒^{𝑑-𝑠}}𝑝(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|𝑦|)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}{\mathbf{1}_{\{𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}\}}}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=𝐢(πœ”)\hspace{-1.67pt}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\hspace{-3.34pt}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\hspace{-1.67pt}{𝑒^{𝑑-𝑠}}\displaystyle \frac{1}{2\sqrt{πœ‹(𝑑\hspace{-1.67pt}-\hspace{-1.67pt}𝑠)}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{{(π‘₯-𝑦)^{2}}}{4(𝑑-𝑠)}\Biggr\}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝐿\hspace{-1.67pt}-\hspace{-1.67pt}|𝑦|)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}{\mathbf{1}_{\{𝑦\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}\}}}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\le 𝐢(πœ”)\displaystyle \frac{2}{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘ }}{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹(𝑑-𝑠)}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(π‘₯-𝑦)^{2}}}{𝑑-𝑠}\Biggr\}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘ }}\Biggl(\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝑦-𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{20.0pt}+\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝑦+𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}\Biggr)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠.\end{array}\]
From the properties of the convolution of density functions of normal distributions, we get
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle {\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹(𝑑-𝑠)}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(π‘₯-𝑦)^{2}}}{𝑑-𝑠}\Biggr\}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘ }}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝑦-𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘‘}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(π‘₯-𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑑}\Biggr\},\\ {} & \displaystyle {\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\displaystyle \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹(𝑑-𝑠)}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(π‘₯-𝑦)^{2}}}{𝑑-𝑠}\Biggr\}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘ }}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝑦+𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑠}\Biggr\}\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}=\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{πœ†}}{\sqrt{πœ‹π‘‘}}\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(π‘₯+𝐿)^{2}}}{𝑑}\Biggr\},\end{array}\]
therefore
\[{\int _{0}^{𝑑}}{\int _{\mathrm{R}}}\mathcal{K}(𝑑-𝑠,π‘₯-𝑦){πœ‰_{𝛿,πœ†,𝐿}}(𝑠,𝑦)\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑦\hspace{1.67pt}𝑑𝑠\le {𝐢_{πœ†,𝛿}}(πœ”)\exp \Biggl\{-\displaystyle \frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}\Biggr\},\]
and (5.5) implies the result of our Theorem. β–‘
RemarkΒ 2.
Let SM πœ‡ be such that $πœ‡((π‘Ž,𝑏])\le 𝐢(πœ”)$, $π‘Ž,\hspace{2.5pt}𝑏\in \mathrm{R}$. Then we can obtain (5.1) for arbitrary $𝐿\in {\mathrm{R}_{+}}$, i.e.
\[\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le 𝐢(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}},\]
where $𝐢(πœ”)$ is independent of 𝐿. This follows from Remark 1, because we used form $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$ only in Lemma 3.
RemarkΒ 3.
For the heat equation with a multiplicative noise driven by the Wiener process, under some assumptions, Theorem 3.1 [2] states that for all $(𝑑,π‘₯)\in [0,𝑇]\times {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, $𝑝\ge 1$ holds
\[\begin{array}{r@{\hskip0pt}l}& \displaystyle {\Bigl\|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr\|_{{\mathrm{L}_{\mathrm{p}}}(\Omega )}}\\ {} & \displaystyle \hspace{10.0pt}\le 𝐢\Biggl(1+\sup \limits_{π‘₯\in \mathrm{R}}\Bigl|{𝑒_{0}}(π‘₯)\Bigr|\Biggr)\Biggl(\exp \Biggl\{-\frac{{(𝐿-π‘₯)^{2}}}{8𝑑}\Biggr\}+\exp \Biggl\{-\frac{{(𝐿+π‘₯)^{2}}}{8𝑑}\Biggr\}\Biggr),\end{array}\]
where 𝐢 is independent of $𝐿,π‘₯,𝑑,{𝑒_{0}}$. In our paper, we have a similar convergence rate for ${𝑒^{𝐿}}\to 𝑒$.
Also, note that Theorem 3.1 [2] includes the cases of the mixed boundary conditions and the Neumann boundary conditions for the equation.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the anonymous referee for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

[1]Β 
Benth, F.E., Lord, G.J., Di Nunno, G., Petersson, A.: The heat modulated infinite dimensional Heston model and its numerical approximation. Stochastics 97, 1038–1078 (2025)
[2]Β 
Candil, D., Dalang, R.C., SolΓ©, M.S.: Asymptotic behavior of the stochastic heat equation over large intervals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02504 (2026)
[3]Β 
Candil, D.J.-M.: Localization errors of the stochastic heat equation. EPFL Ph.D. Thesis, 221 (2022). MR5049662. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01650-8
[4]Β 
Dalang, R.C., Sanz-SolΓ©, M.: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations, Space-Time White Noise and Random Fields. Springer, Cham (2026). MR2984063. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2012-05616-9
[5]Β 
Foondun, M., Khoshnevisan, D.: On the stochastic heat equation with spatially-colored random forcing. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 365(1), 409–458 (2013). MR3647962. https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/3201
[6]Β 
GerencsΓ©r, M., GyΓΆngy, I.: Localization errors in solving stochastic partial differential equations in the whole space. Math. Comput. 86, 2373–2397 (2017). MR1435501
[7]Β 
Gikhman, I.I., Skorokhod, A.V.: Introduction to the Theory of Random Processes. Dover Publications Inc, New York (1996). MR3026658. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35401-4
[8]Β 
Hilber, N., Reichmann, O., Schwab, C., Winter, C.: Computational Methods for Quantitative Finance: Finite Element Methods for Derivative Pricing. Springer (2013). MR1167198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0425-1
[9]Β 
KwapieΕ„, S., WoyczyΕ„ski, W.A.: Random Series and Stochastic Integrals: Single and Multiple. BirkhΓ€user, Boston (1992). MR4852563. https://doi.org/10.15559/24-vmsta262
[10]Β 
Manikin, B.: Heat equation with a general stochastic measure in a bounded domain. Mod. Stoch. Theory Appl. 12, 61–82 (2025). MR2378138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75873-0
[11]Β 
Mishura, Y.S.: Stochastic Calculus for Fractional Brownian Motion and Related Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008). MR2356959. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511721373
[12]Β 
Peszat, S., Zabczyk, J.: Stochastic Partial Differential Equations with LΓ©vy Noise: An Evolution Equation Approach. CUP, Cambridge (2007). MR2849590
[13]Β 
Pinsky, M.A.: Partial Differential Equations and Boundary-value Problems with Applications. AMS, Providence (2011). MR2766653. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0040585X97984048
[14]Β 
Radchenko, V.: Sample functions of stochastic measures and Besov spaces. Theory Probab. Appl. 54, 160–168 (2010). MR4687103
[15]Β 
Radchenko, V.: General Stochastic Measures. Integration, Path Properties, and Equations. ISTE Ltd, London (2022). MR4608186. https://doi.org/10.15559/23-vmsta224
[16]Β 
Radchenko, V.: The Burgers equation driven by a stochastic measure. Mod. Stoch. Theory Appl. 10(3), 229–246 (2023). MR4751817. https://doi.org/10.1090/tpms/1213
[17]Β 
Radchenko, V.: The Burgers-type equation driven by a stochastic measure. Theory Probab. Math. Stat. 110, 185–199 (2024). MR5093735
[18]Β 
Radchenko, V.: The Burgers-type equation on a line segment driven by a stochastic measure. Theory Probab. Math. Stat. 114, 127–146 (2026). MR1280932
[19]Β 
Samorodnitsky, G., Taqqu, M.S.: Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes. Chapman and Hall, London (1994). MR3967104. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108627771
[20]Β 
Wainwright, M.J.: High-Dimensional Statistics: A Non-Asymptotic Viewpoint. CUP, Cambridge (2019)
Reading mode PDF XML

Table of contents
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Preliminaries
  • 3 The problem
  • 4 Auxiliary lemma
  • 5 Main result
  • Acknowledgments
  • References

Copyright
Β© 2026 The Author(s). Published by VTeX.
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Stochastic measure stochastic heat equation Dirichlet boundary conditions asymptotic properties of the solution

MSC
60H15 35R60

Metrics
since March 2018
4

Article info
views

3

Full article
views

2

PDF
downloads

0

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

  • Theorems
    1
TheoremΒ 1.
TheoremΒ 1.
Let Assumptions A1–A5 hold, ${𝑒^{𝐿}}$ is the solution to (3.1), 𝑒 is the solution to (3.2). Then, for each $𝛿\gt 0$ there exist versions of ${𝑒^{𝐿}},𝑒$ such that for all $πœ”\in \Omega $ for each $π‘₯\in {𝐷_{𝐿}}$, $𝐿=𝑖𝛿$, $𝑖\in {\mathrm{Z}_{+}}$, $0\lt 𝑑\le 𝑇$, for any $0\lt πœ†\lt \frac{1}{4}$ holds
(5.1)
\[\Bigl|{𝑒^{𝐿}}(𝑑,π‘₯)-𝑒(𝑑,π‘₯)\Bigr|\le {𝐢_{𝛿}}(πœ”){𝐢_{πœ†}}{𝑒^{-\frac{πœ†{(𝐿-|π‘₯|)^{2}}}{𝑑}}}.\]

MSTA

Journal

  • Online ISSN: 2351-6054
  • Print ISSN: 2351-6046
  • Copyright © 2018 VTeX

About

  • About journal
  • Indexed in
  • Editors-in-Chief

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer

Contact us

  • ejournals-vmsta@vtex.lt
  • MokslininkΕ³ 2A
  • LT-08412 Vilnius
  • Lithuania
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy